AL: Federal appeals court strikes down Alabama sex offender law banning Tuscaloosa father from living with his child

Source: wbrc.com 9/29/26

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WBRC) – A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that a provision of Alabama’s sex offender law is unconstitutional as applied to a Tuscaloosa County father, deciding the state cannot permanently bar him from living with his young son.

In a 30-page opinion, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the Alabama Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Act (ASORCNA) fails strict constitutional scrutiny because it enforces a mandatory, lifetime ban on parents living with their children without offering any case-by-case review.

Under the 2011 state statute, any person convicted of a sex offense involving a child is permanently prohibited from residing or conducting an overnight visit with a minor, even their own biological children, regardless of whether the original offense involved a family member or shared household. Alabama law provides no mechanism or hearing for an offender to seek an exception.

The plaintiff, Bruce Henry, pleaded guilty in 2013 to federal charges of possessing child pornography after investigators found downloaded images and videos on his computer. Henry had no prior sexual offense history, served five years in federal prison, and completed supervised release along with required sex-offender treatment.

Following his release, Henry married and had a son. Because of Alabama’s residency restrictions, Henry was legally barred from living under the same roof as his wife and child, prompting him to file a federal lawsuit against the Tuscaloosa County Sheriff, the Tuscaloosa County District Attorney, and the Alabama Attorney General.

In their writing, the court recognized that while Alabama holds a compelling interest in protecting minors from sexual abuse, the state’s absolute, lifetime residency ban is unconstitutionally broad. The court noted that multiple psychological evaluations categorized Henry as posing a very low risk of recidivism and that state authorities offered no individualized evidence that Henry posed a danger to his son.

“Because the Act permanently and categorically strips …

Read the full article

 

 

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

1 Comment